Thursday, December 17, 2009
Othello #6
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Othello #5
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Othello #4
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Othello #3
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Othello #2
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Othello #1
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
12 Angry Men Essay 12-1-09
Melissa Johnson
Honors English/E
Guilty As Charged
It is up to you, the jury, to keep this killer off the streets, away from you and away from your families. It is imperative that you do not see this boy as a young, confused boy who deserves to experience life. You must see him as a troubled, boy who killed his father and is more than capable of killing more innocent human beings. I ask you now to think about the oath you took the day you walked in this courtroom. The words of that oath do not only apply to the people around us, but to our country and to upholding its dignity. You owe it to the people of the
Now, I am going to share with you some background information about this boy. His whole life he has been surrounded by violence. It has been proven in the past, time after time, that children who grow up in less than desirable circumstances are the ones that tend to lash out in their teen years. Although it is believed the reason this young boy killed his father is because he was done taking his fathers beatings. Is death really a fair way to stop beatings? Please ask yourself this, would killing someone be the first thing that comes to your mind after an argument? Most would answer no, which proves that we must keep those who would answer yes somewhere that they will not cause danger to others. By letting this boy roam free, we are endangering other citizens.
In this case, we are given two pieces of visual evidence from different witnesses. One being from the old man who lives downstairs, and one being from a woman who lives across the el train tracks from them. The old man claims to have heard the father and the young boy fighting, and clearly heard the words “I’m going to kill you!” come from the boy’s mouth. Right after that, he heard a body hit the floor and quickly made it to his door, only to see the young boy running down the stairs and out of the building. If this is not evidence enough, the woman across the way claims to have actually seen the killing with her own two eyes. If you still have an ounce of reasonable doubt in your mind, please consider these questions, first: why would these two people go to the trouble of making up stories, only to put themselves through this tedious court process? And second: what do they have to gain from this? The answer is: nothing.
Along with these two pieces of visual evidence, we also have one piece of very tangible evidence: the knife. Do any of you honestly think that there could be such a great coincidence that the knife found at the crime scene is the same kind the bou bought earlier that day? The man who sold the knife to him testified, in front of all of us, that it was the exact knife he sold to the young boy, and it was the only one of its kind. If that is not evidence enough, his shaky alibi should tip your scare to the boy being guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. He claimed to be at the cinema, but when asked about the movie he saw, he couldn’t even give any general facts. On top of that, no one who was at the theater that night could identify him. When you pay to go see a movie, do you not even pay enough attention to remember the genre or title of the film? I think we can all agree in saying that we do.
If you let this boy loose on the conclusion of him being not guilty, it will constantly be on your conscience. To be honest, I believe it should be there because you will be unleashing a killer into our streets. By doing so, you are opening countless more opportunities for him to take the lives of others. No one is asking you to kill this boy; we are asking you to come to an honest and well thought out verdict. We are simply asking whether he is guilty of killing his father or not and the answer is yes.
This boy is like a piƱata. The more he is beat and tossed around, the closer he gets to his breaking point. This crime may have only been the whack that caused the first pieces of candy to fall. If you let him loose on the conclusion of not guilty, it is inevitable that the final break will come and he will wreak havoc on countless innocent people. When he goes on to commit more crimes, it will remain on your conscience until the day he receives the punishment he deserves. If you all do your jobs and come to an honest and well thought out verdict, that punishment will come sooner rather than later. No one is asking you to kill this boy; we are simply asking you to uphold the duty you owe to the
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Antigone Essay
Melissa Johnson
English-E- Mr. George
November 9, 2009
Antigone Essay
Oedipus and Creon, Different yet Very Much the Same
All rulers are faced with their own struggles, but also have their moments to
shine. When being faced with these struggles, there are many ways they can be dealt with that may lay the foundation for how they are viewed throughout their reign. The two infamous men with power that Sophocles writes about, Creon and Oedipus, deal with their own share of obstacles that they overcome in ways that may be viewed as similar, which can cause them to be judged differently than expected. Oedipus and Creon share similar traits, but the differences between the two famous rulers of
The most prominent difference between Oedipus and Creon is that Creon is more to blame for everything that happens to him. This is true because he was never struck with a horrible fate, such as Oedipus’s, and he had an example set before him. If Creon had looked to Oedipus’s mistakes as exactly what not to do as king, he would have put himself in a much better position. Another important difference between the two is that Creon made promises to the people of
Both Oedipus and Creon, along with many in power back then, had the misfortune of being consumed with pride. This consumption often led them to being very quick to judge others who were simply trying to display the truth. Their pride led to this extremely judgmental characteristic because they could not handle others questioning their knowledge or innocence. It is clear in both Oedipus Rex and Antigone that both kings tend to immediately threaten those who, in reality, haven’t done anything wrong. In Oedipus Rex, the blind prophet, Tiresias, is straight forward and tells Oedipus he is the one who murdered King Laius. Without even considering the fact that he may be right, Oedipus threatens Tiresias:
TIRESIAS: I say that you and your most dearly loved are wrapped together in a hideous sin, blind to the horror of it.
OEDIPUS: You think you can go on blabbering unscathed?
TIRESIAS: Unscathed indeed, if truth is strength.
OEDIPUS: It is. But not for you, you purblind man: in ears and mind and vision (21).
In Antigone, Creon proves that he shares this trait with Oedipus during his conversation with the sentry. When he states that it is a shame Creon doesn’t have better reasoning, Creon responds by saying, “A logic chopper and a wit! But don’t imagine that will save your skin” (204). Creon especially would have been better off and more able to change the way things played out if his sense of pride didn’t stand in the way of him listening to others. It would have also helped Oedipus, but not as much, because he wasn’t able to prevent most things from happening due to his fate.
Oedipus and Creon were also similar in that they were both extremely stubborn; however, Creon wasn’t quite as ignorant as Oedipus. Unlike Oedipus, Creon came to and realized that he had made some serious mistakes and that he wanted to change things. He attempted to free Antigone in order to allow her to marry his son, but it was too late. Creon found her dead body in the chamber, with his sons’ body alongside. Although by the time he realized what he had done was wrong it was too late to change the outcome, at least he tried. By the time Oedipus had realized his mistakes, it was impossible to even attempt to change things because everything had already taken place. It is clear that Creon felt much more responsible for the situation while it was happening, which proves that he is much less stubborn than Oedipus was during his rule: “It’s hard to eat my words, but harder still to court catastrophe through overriding pride” (240). He was willing to accept that he did not want to cause even more chaos and that he needed to put his pride aside for the time being in order to save his son, Haemon, and his future daughter in law, Antigone, from facing their dreadful ends.
It is important to know that although there are many similarities between Oedipus and Creon and how they ruled